The fact that Gaddafi was a horrible man able to kill its own people or the fact that Strauss-Khan is surrounded by sexual scandals does not mean at all, and I repeat, AT ALL, that what they said, or say, about SARKOZY is wrong.
I have the feeling that Sarkozy believes that people who had been terrible dictators or countrymen surrounded by sexual scandals cannot tell the truth about him. Why not?
Maybe the difference between Sarkozy and Gaddafi and Strauss-Khan is that two of them have paid in some way for their wrongdoings while Sarkozy is just accused of wrongdoings.
Well, what I believe Strauss-Khan when he says the things he says about Sarkozy. They knew his weakness and they attacked him. This does not make Strauss-Kahn a saint but it could make Sarkozy the opposite of an angel.
The son of Gaddafi is still alive. He may know something about the money that Gaddafi maybe gave to Sarkozy.
Whatever it happens I have the feeling this is the end of Sarkozy. The shadow of Gaddafi and the words of Strauus-Kahn may hurt him more than the current advantage of his political adversary.
- Strauss-Kahn: Secret Weapon Of Socialists – OpEd (eurasiareview.com)
- Dominique Strauss-Kahn accuses Sarkozy allies of choreographing maid scandal (telegraph.co.uk)
- DSK: New York sex scandal orchestrated by political opponents | World news | The Guardian (2012indyinfo.com)